AI Software Inventor on Patent

Can AI Be An Inventor on a Patent? US Court Says No and Supreme Court Declines Challenge

Asked to decide if an artificial intelligence (AI) software system can be listed as the inventor on a patent application, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) said no. And SCOTUS recently declined to hear a challenge to the case.

The case raised the fundamental question of whether non-human entities can be recognized as inventors under the Patent Act.

According to the Patent Act, the term “inventor” is explicitly limited to natural persons, i.e., human beings. Consequently, the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) denied a computer scientist’s patent applications that failed to identify any human as an inventor. The only inventor listed on the patent application was the very software that the computer scientist had created.

The definition of “individual” is not explicitly provided in the Patent Act. However, the Supreme Court has previously clarified that “individual” generally refers to a human being or a person when used as a noun. While this particular ruling (Mohamad v. Palestinian Auth., 566 U.S. 449, 454, 2012) was unrelated to patents, it highlighted the understanding of “individual” in legal contexts.

The CAFC firmly held that an inventor must be a human being, drawing support from its own precedent and reasoning. Consequently, the court confirmed that patent inventors must be actual individuals.

It is worth noting an intriguing detail mentioned in the opinion. The plaintiff pointed out that South Africa has granted patents with his software acknowledged as an inventor. While this aspect warrants further investigation, those interested can explore the full opinion in Thaler v. Vidal.

And remember, if you are an inventor filing a patent application, paying close attention to accurately listing the inventors is of utmost importance. Surprisingly, this crucial aspect is often overlooked or glanced over by applicants. Getting inventorship right is essential to ensure the validity and success of your patent. If you have any questions about what constitutes an inventor or any other patent-related queries, don’t hesitate to reach out.

Source: Reuters

Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple are among the top patent recipients in 2021

Top 20 Companies for Patents in 2021

The companies below know the value of patents. It’s a big part of their success and ability to both compete and maintain their leadership positions.

They all invest significant amounts of time and money to obtain patents and cultivate patent portfolios. And it pays off.

Be like one of these companies.

Here are the top 20 patent recipients for 2021:

1. International Business Machines Corp: 8,682 patents granted
2. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd: 6,366 patents granted
3. Canon Inc: 3,021 patents granted
4. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co TSMC Ltd: 2,798 patents granted
5. Huawei Technologies Co Ltd: 2,770 patents granted
6. Intel Corp: 2,615 patents granted
7. Apple Inc: 2,541 patents granted
8. LG Electronics Inc: 2,487 patents granted
9. Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC: 2,418 patents granted
10. Qualcomm Inc: 2,149 patents granted
11. BOE Technology Group Co Ltd: 2,135 patents granted
12. Toyota Motor Corp: 2,028 patents granted
13. Samsung Display Co Ltd: 1,975 patents granted
14. Amazon Technologies Inc: 1,942 patents granted
15. Micron Technology Inc: 1,789 patents granted
16. Sony Corp: 1,683 patents granted
17. Ford Global Technologies LLC: 1,626 patents granted
18. Google LLC: 1,493 patents granted
19. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB: 1,387 patents granted
20. Hyundai Motor Co: 1,269 patents granted

Source: https://thetechxp.com/over-2500-u-s-patents-granted-in-2021-puts-apple-in-7th-place/

www internet source code nft auction

Original Web Browser Source Code Being Auctioned as NFT

Tim Berners-Lee, known as the inventor of the World Wide Web, is auctioning off the source code to the original web browser as an NFT. Some find Berners-Lee’s sale of his intellectual property odd because he famously refused to patent what is clearly one of the most important inventions in history.

Invented in 1989, the “WorldWideWeb” application was the first hypermedia browser/editor, allowing users to create and navigate links between files across a network of computers.

The auction includes the original archive of dated and time-stamped files, approximately 10,000 lines of source code for the HTML, HTTP, and URI protocols that are still in use today. Also included are the original HTML documents that instructed early web users on how to use the application.

Sotheby’s, which is running the auction, compares owning Berners-Lee’s code to owning the original hand-written manuscript of Charles Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species”.

USPTO Issues Patent No 11000000 Twitter @patentauthority Elliot Furman

United States Issues Patent Number 11,000,000

The United States issues patent number 11,000,000 today, three years after the USPTO issued patent number 10 million.

The first patent, which was signed by George Washington, was issued on July 31, 1790 to Samuel Hopkins for a process of making potash, an ingredient used in fertilizer. By 1836, over 9,900 patents had been issued. On July 13 of that year the U.S. started numbering patents. Patent No. 1 was issued to John Ruggles for a traction wheel for steam locomotives.

Since then, patents have issued at an exponential rate.

USPTO Exponential Growth of Patents
Image Courtesy of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Patent No. 11,000,000 is for a new method for delivering, positioning, and/or repositioning a collapsible and expandable stent frame within a patient’s heart chamber.

Other interesting historical facts about patents can be found on the USPTO’s page Milestones in U.S. Patenting.

Peloton Bike

How Peloton Uses Patents to Crush Competitors and How You Can Too

The wild success of Peloton shows the immense power of patents and how they can become absolutely essential to the success and longevity of your company, especially if you are a startup. A well thought out and executed patent portfolio isn’t optional anymore.

Peloton is aggressively using its patents to maintain its leadership. Some are skeptical as to the strength of their patents. Nonetheless, patents are clearly an important – and successful – part of their strategy to stop competitors and project a powerful marketing image.

By many standards, Peloton doesn’t even have that large of a US patent portfolio. A search for Peloton’s patents uncovered 16 issued patents, half of them design patents. One simply claims the GUI for the portion of their screen that says “Leaderboard”.

Nevertheless, Peloton has maintained its leadership and shows no sign of being stopped by anyone. After being sued by Peloton for patent infringement, Flywheel announced last year that they will stop selling stationary bikes and in-home fitness classes. Flywheel then filed for bankruptcy.

Peloton has itself been been the target of patent infringement suits. Icon, maker of NordicTrack, and Peloton have sued each other several times. Both companies have been using their patents to strike and counterstrike each other, illustrating the offensive and defensive ways that patents can be used as part of a business strategy to maintain market dominance. Perhaps Icon and Peloton will eventually agree to a patent cross-licensing deal. Time will tell.

Other companies that have sued Peloton include Madd Dogg Athletics who own the trademark registration for SPINNING, Echelon Fitness (maker of a competitive stationary bike), and Dish Technologies (who own Sling TV) for video streaming technology that they say is central to Peloton’s success. Peloton is fighting back hard and has the patents and other tools at its disposal to do so.

Patents can be used offensively to discourage and stop competitors, defensively to fend off attacks from competitors, and cooperatively in cross-licensing agreements that benefit all parties. They can also be used to project a market-leading image.

Contact me to strategize about how patents can play a role in the success of your business.

(Featured image courtesy of One Peloton)

(Sources: Above The Law – Patent Pedaling With Peloton (Part I): Downhill, and Patent Pedaling With Peloton (Part II): Uphill)

Scroll to Top