<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>patentauthority.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patentauthority.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patentauthority.com</link>
	<description>Domestic and International Patents</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-RC1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Supreme Court: Software is Patentable</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/06/supreme-court-software-is-patentable/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/06/supreme-court-software-is-patentable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[101]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bilski]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business methods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court has issued its long awaited opinion in Bilski v. Kappos.  Read it here.  The Supreme Court essentially affirmed the Federal Circuit&#8217;s decision which is summarized here.
via Patently-O and Filewrapper.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/06/supreme-court-software-is-patentable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Business Method Patents at the U.S. Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/05/business-method-patents-supreme-court/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/05/business-method-patents-supreme-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 11:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[101]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bilski]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business methods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 1, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Bilski v. Doll, and will consider whether the en banc decision of the Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit &#8220;Federal Circuit&#8221; in subjecting business method patents to the &#8220;machine or transformation&#8221; test was appropriate. Specifically, the Supreme Court will consider the following [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/05/business-method-patents-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Buys iPad Trademark from Fujitsu</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/apple-buys-ipad-trademark-from-fujitsu/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/apple-buys-ipad-trademark-from-fujitsu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 17:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Trademarks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fujitsu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple now owns the iPad trademark.  The trademark (Serial No. 76497338) was filed by Fujitsu in March of 2003 for their iPad wireless handheld computing device used by retailers.  Records at the U.S. Patent and Trademark office show that the trademark was assigned to Apple on March 17.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/apple-buys-ipad-trademark-from-fujitsu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Popular Science Archive Is Online - All 137 Years!</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/popular-science-archives-google-books/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/popular-science-archives-google-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 21:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Inventions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[archives]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[magazines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[popsci]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prior art]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[retro]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scifi]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The entire 137-year archive of Popular Science is available online! Thanks Google!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/popular-science-archives-google-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Patent Lawsuits&#8230; No End in Sight</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/mobile-patent-lawsuits/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/mobile-patent-lawsuits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trolls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

The New York Times reports,
Although patent litigation is not new in the technology world, these  suits, specifically around mobile, point to the drastically changing  mobile landscape. Lawyers I spoke with explained that mobile technology  was still in its infancy and  these large computing companies were  trying to stake their claim [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/mobile-patent-lawsuits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The complaints in Apple&#8217;s lawsuit against HTC</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/complaints-in-apple-lawsuit-against-htc/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/complaints-in-apple-lawsuit-against-htc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[itc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported yesterday, Apple is suing HTC for infringing on twenty iPhone related patents.  HTC makes mobile phones and smartphones including Google&#8217;s Nexus One and phones sold by Verizon, Sprint, and T-Mobile (1, 2)  running Google&#8217;s Android operating system.
Below are the complaints filed in U.S. District Court in Delaware and with the U.S. International Trade [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/complaints-in-apple-lawsuit-against-htc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Sues HTC - maker of Google Nexus - for Patent Infringement</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/apple-sues-htc-maker-of-google-nexus-for-patent-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/apple-sues-htc-maker-of-google-nexus-for-patent-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nexus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We&#8217;ve decided to do something about it,&#8221; said Steve Jobs, Apple&#8217;s CEO. &#8220;We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.&#8221;
via Apple Sues HTC for Patent Infringement - Barrons.com.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/03/apple-sues-htc-maker-of-google-nexus-for-patent-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prior Art and Research: Social Science Research Network</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/prior-art-and-research-social-science-research-network/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/prior-art-and-research-social-science-research-network/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[journals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[legal theory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prior art]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another site to search prior art and scholarly articles:
Social Science Research Network SSRN Home Page.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/prior-art-and-research-social-science-research-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Litigation Trends - It Pays to be a Patent Troll</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/it-pays-to-be-a-patent-troll/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/it-pays-to-be-a-patent-troll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rambus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent PriceWaterhouseCoopers study suggests that nonpracticing entities (NPE), more commonly referred to as patent trolls, are thriving.
The largest award went to Dr. Bruce Saffran who, in 2008, was awarded nearly $432 million in damages (and, not reported in the study, another $69 million in pre-judgment interest awarded by the judge after the trial).  A [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/it-pays-to-be-a-patent-troll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$2.322 billion to USPTO for 2011</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/uspto-budget-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/uspto-budget-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[* Up 23 percent from 2010&#8217;s expected budget.
* Proposal to increase statutory patent fees by 15 percent.
* USPTO hoping to reduce average of 34.6 months to approve or reject a patent application.
links: FY2010 President&#8217;s Budget Request, USPTO Budget, Plans, and Reports.
(via U.S. patent office gets boost in Obama budget &#124; Reuters)
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/uspto-budget-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad - The New Apple Tablet!  Liveblog Event</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/01/ipad-the-new-apple-tablet-liveblog-event/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2010/01/ipad-the-new-apple-tablet-liveblog-event/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Inventions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[liveblog]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tablets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://live.gizmodo.com/
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2010/01/ipad-the-new-apple-tablet-liveblog-event/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PTO Rescinds Controversial Patent Rules</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/10/pto-rescinds-controversial-patent-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/10/pto-rescinds-controversial-patent-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Laws and Rules]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[continuations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/2009/10/pto-rescinds-controversial-patent-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The claim and continuation rules that were supposed to go into effect on November 1, 2007 are dying a slow death&#8230; thankfully.
via Law.com - PTO Rescinds Controversial Patent Rules.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/10/pto-rescinds-controversial-patent-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PDF Creators Compatible with EFS-Web</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/10/pdf-creators-compatible-with-efs-web/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/10/pdf-creators-compatible-with-efs-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[efs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EFS-Web is the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (USPTO’s) web-based patent application and document submission system.  I have been filing all my documents electronically since the USPTO started beta testing electronic filing (and I am shocked to see that some law firms still do not use electronic filing). All documents filed via EFS-Web must be pdfs with embedded fonts, or image-based pdfs.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/10/pdf-creators-compatible-with-efs-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent Rejections at Nearly 60%</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/08/patent-rejections-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/08/patent-rejections-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After consistently rejecting applications at a rate of about 35% since 1975, the Patent Office — faced with a growing backlog — underwent a convulsive shift around 2004 and now turns down well over half. In the quarter that ended June 30, it denied more than 59%.
via jsonline.com &#8220;Patent rejections soar as pressure on agency rises&#8220;.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/08/patent-rejections-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to digitize your life (or at least have a paperless office)</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/digitize-your-life-paperless-office/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/digitize-your-life-paperless-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Q & A]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[howto]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[backups]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[OCR]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pdf]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scanners]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the last several years many people have asked me how to remove paper from their lives.  Here are some tips on how to empty your file cabinets and get rid of that pile of mail.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/digitize-your-life-paperless-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patenting Methods of Determining the Value of Patents?</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/patenting-methods-of-determining-value-of-patents/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/patenting-methods-of-determining-value-of-patents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[infringement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[methods]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[valuation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/patenting-methods-of-determining-the-value-of-patents/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, will we see lawsuits for infringement, not of the patents that are sold, but for determining how much to sell them for?
7,493,262 Method for valuing intellectual property
7,386,460 System and method for developing and implementing intellectual property marketing
7,346,545 Method and system for payment of intellectual property royalties by interposed sponsor on behalf of consumer over [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/patenting-methods-of-determining-value-of-patents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nvidia Scores Win Against Rambus in Patent Fight</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/nvidia-scores-win-against-rambus-in-patent-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/nvidia-scores-win-against-rambus-in-patent-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USPTO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[itc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nvidia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rambus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/nvidia-scores-win-against-rambus-in-patent-fight/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rambus replied that the game is hardly over.
via eWeek.com Nvidia Scores Win Against Rambus in Patent Fight.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/07/nvidia-scores-win-against-rambus-in-patent-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>May 26, 1981: Programmer-Attorney Wins First U.S. Software Patent</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/05/first-us-software-patent/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/05/first-us-software-patent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Inventions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/2009/05/may-26-1981-programmer-attorney-wins-first-us-software-patent-this-day-in-tech-wiredcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[May 26, 1981: Programmer-Attorney Wins First U.S. Software Patent
via May 26, 1981: Programmer-Attorney Wins First U.S. Software Patent &#124; This Day In Tech &#124; Wired.com.
Link: U.S. Patent No. 4,270,182.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/05/first-us-software-patent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Feynman - Ode on a Flower</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/05/richard-feynman-ode-on-a-flower/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/05/richard-feynman-ode-on-a-flower/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[People]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[feynman]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/2009/05/richard-feynman-ode-on-a-flower/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Richard Feynman was one of the great physicists of the 20th century, and an incredible teacher.  He won the Nobel Prize in Physics for his contributions to the development of quantum electrodynamics.
I learned about Feynman in the 1980s when I was studying physics, and spent many a night watching films of his famous lectures at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/05/richard-feynman-ode-on-a-flower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TOP 10 Litigation Wins of 2008</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2009/03/top-10-litigation-wins-of-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://patentauthority.com/2009/03/top-10-litigation-wins-of-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentauthority</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Patents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iplaw]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/2009/03/top-10-litigation-wins-of-2008/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TOP 10 Litigation Wins of 2008
via TOP 10 Litigation Wins of 2008.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://patentauthority.com/2009/03/top-10-litigation-wins-of-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
