<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Litigation Trends &#8211; It Pays to be a Patent Troll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/it-pays-to-be-a-patent-troll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/it-pays-to-be-a-patent-troll/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=it-pays-to-be-a-patent-troll</link>
	<description>Domestic and International Patents, Trademarks, and IP Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: soylent</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/it-pays-to-be-a-patent-troll/comment-page-1/#comment-13216</link>
		<dc:creator>soylent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=362#comment-13216</guid>
		<description>Rambus has never been anything but a patent troll. The core of their business model is the use of submarine patents. Internal Rambus documents released as part of their court case in 2001 clearly demonstrated an intention of using submarine patents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rambus has never been anything but a patent troll. The core of their business model is the use of submarine patents. Internal Rambus documents released as part of their court case in 2001 clearly demonstrated an intention of using submarine patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolv Heggenhougen</title>
		<link>http://patentauthority.com/2010/02/it-pays-to-be-a-patent-troll/comment-page-1/#comment-12778</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolv Heggenhougen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentauthority.com/?p=362#comment-12778</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rambus, a company that at one time actually sold computer memory...&quot;

Rambus NEVER sold computer memory. The founders behind Rambus invented revolutionary new ways to speed up memory systems and solved the cpu/memory bottleneck. They never planned on manufacturing but rather to license their intellectual property. A few very large companies; Samsung, Hynix, Siemens, Micron and Nvidia choose to not take a license and just incorporate Rambus&#039; inventions anyway. The law suits started and Micron and Hynix sued Rambus (not the other way around) on opposite coasts one day apart. Rambus is not and never was a patent troll but when your property is stolen from companies who had been presented the solutions under non-disclosure you defend yourself. Luckily for Rambus companies such as Intel, IBM and Toshiba took licenses and this gave them enough funds to pay the astronomical legal fees.

I am shocked at the heading of your article and it makes one wonder what the intention behind that heading is when the article contains completely false information!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rambus, a company that at one time actually sold computer memory&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Rambus NEVER sold computer memory. The founders behind Rambus invented revolutionary new ways to speed up memory systems and solved the cpu/memory bottleneck. They never planned on manufacturing but rather to license their intellectual property. A few very large companies; Samsung, Hynix, Siemens, Micron and Nvidia choose to not take a license and just incorporate Rambus&#8217; inventions anyway. The law suits started and Micron and Hynix sued Rambus (not the other way around) on opposite coasts one day apart. Rambus is not and never was a patent troll but when your property is stolen from companies who had been presented the solutions under non-disclosure you defend yourself. Luckily for Rambus companies such as Intel, IBM and Toshiba took licenses and this gave them enough funds to pay the astronomical legal fees.</p>
<p>I am shocked at the heading of your article and it makes one wonder what the intention behind that heading is when the article contains completely false information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

