<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PTO will apply its “broadest reasonable” claim interpretation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patentauthority.com/2008/12/patent-law-blog-patently-o-bpai-pto-should-apply-broadest-reasonable-claim-interpretation-to-section-101-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patentauthority.com/2008/12/patent-law-blog-patently-o-bpai-pto-should-apply-broadest-reasonable-claim-interpretation-to-section-101-analysis/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=patent-law-blog-patently-o-bpai-pto-should-apply-broadest-reasonable-claim-interpretation-to-section-101-analysis</link>
	<description>Domestic and International Patents, Trademarks, and IP Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 21:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	</channel>
</rss>

